At Sharp Football Analysis, my number one goal is winning for my clients. Keeping accurate and honest records is the only way to prove that. When you have a solid track record of covering NFL point spreads, you want to share that record. Win or lose. Every handicapper deals with variance. But only truly reliable services will have high long term win percentages. How many handicapping sites have you have visited that display no records at all? Or only records sharing their latest "streak"? At Sharp Football Analysis, there is nothing to hide, and in an otherwise secretive industry, our accurate and honest record keeping is a breath of fresh air.

This season, you will see each and every play I give to clients appear in the ledger just minutes after the game's kickoff. This self-monitoring is completely transparent.There will be no need for shady monitoring services pumping up records in exchange for money. Very few of the so-called "best handicappers" out there are willing to track this information, because there is no way to hide their losses. But here at Sharp Football Analysis, my records are my calling card, it's my resume for my work. Preview my YTD records since I started publicly handicapping games and follow along with the 2011 NFL record as the games are played. You'll soon agree: when you want accurate records full of winning plays that cover the NFL spread pick Sharp Football Analysis.

Recent Games

Records

Final CFB Bowl Record (27-13, 68%) and Season Recap

2012 NFL Playoffs:

2-1 Wildcard Round

5-3 Divisional Round

4-2 Championship Round

1-1 Super Bowl (1-1 also on Graded Props)

Since Thanksgiving:  94-46 (67%) in all football, NFL has won 7 of last 8 weeks

2012 Regular Season Wins Plays for Clients - 6-2 (75%)

Ws: Ind O 5, Jac U 5.5, Min O 6, TB O 6, NYG U 9.5, Ari U 7; Ls: Cin U 8, Buf O 8

This study looks at the important aspect of beating the closing number. When you beat the closing number, you know the majority of the large money wagered on a game agreed with your bet after you placed it. In addition, when getting good line value, you have the option to middle a game if you want to bet around a key number. But you can only do this if you are able to get good line value. In 2011, Sharp's NFL totals beat the closing number in 71 bets meaning Sharp beat the closing number almost 4 times more frequently than he lost to it.

Highlights By Year

2011 Season Highlights

• 11 winning weeks
• Only 4 losing weeks out of 17 total weeks;
• All plays issued in the 2011 regular season went 143-116 (55%)
• Computer Totals went 40-24 (63%) thru Week 11 before finishing the season 55-50.
• Personal Plays: 73-52 (58%)

2010 Season Highlights

• 12 winning weeks
• Computer totals hit 59% for the season;
• Computer program hit 54% for the season;
• Only 4 losing weeks out of 17 total weeks;
• 3 times more winning weeks than losing weeks;
• All plays issued in the 2010 regular season hit 57%;
• 16 strongest valued Overs went 16-0 (100%). Some were "Overs Plays", some were "Overs Leans".
• Personal Plays: 59-42-3 (58.4%)

2009 Season Highlights

• 10 winning weeks;
• Computer totals hit 60% for the season;
• Computer program hit 56% for the season;
• Only 4 losing weeks out of 17 total weeks;
• 2.5 times more winning weeks than losing weeks;
• All plays issued in the 2009 regular season hit 54%; In 9 of the 10 winning weeks, we hit 63% or better in all plays.
• Computer program hit a rough 4 week stretch wks 8-11. In the other 13 weeks of the 17 weeks this season, the computer program hit 65% (43-23 from ATS+totals combined);
• Ended the season on a solid run, posting 5 winning weeks and just 1 losing week, with the winning weeks going 4-2 (67%), 5-3 (63%), 6-3 (67%), 7-3 (70%) and 4-3 (57%).
• Personal Plays: 34-34-3 (50%)

2008 Season Highlights

• 13 winning weeks;
• Computer totals hit 67% for the season;
• Computer program hit 65% for the season;
• Only 4 losing weeks out of 17 total weeks;
• 3 times more winning weeks than losing weeks;
• All plays issued in the 2008 regular season hit 66%;
• In 12 of the 13 winning weeks, we hit 62% or better in all plays.
• Personal Plays: 39-20 (66%)

2007 Season Highlights

• 12 winning weeks; Computer totals hit 69% for the season;
• Computer program hit 66% for the season;
• Only 2 losing weeks out of 17 total weeks;
• 6 times more winning weeks than losing weeks;
• In 11 of the 12 winning weeks, we hit 67% or better in all plays.
• Personal Plays: 58-36-3 (62%)

2006 Season Highlights

• 11 winning weeks;
• Computer totals hit 70% for the season;
• Computer program hit 72% for the season;
• Only 2 losing weeks out of 17 total weeks;
• 5.5 times more winning weeks than losing weeks;
• In 11 of the 11 winning weeks, we hit 63% or better in all plays.

2005 Season Highlights

Looking back at 2005, I did not track my W-L record as my system was in the "testing" phase. However, the one contest I did participate in was the Wagerline Playoff Competition. Out of 5,900 contestants, I finished in 1st Place. Playing sides and totals for most games, I finished 16-2 (89%) and +6630 Units. Looking at all Wagerline contest results in their Hall Of Fame from 1999 thru present, no one has won one of the Wagerline contests (in any sport) with a higher win % than 89%. See link for proof on the documented plays page. Note on Records: System records from 2007-2008 were and posted on message boards online on a weekly basis for verification, as were all personal plays. Personal plays from 2008-2009 were posted on message boards and e-mailed to subscribers on a weekly basis thru Week 9, where they went 23-9-2 (72%). These were also posted each week on my blog, to which I can provide a link upon request. System plays from weeks 7-9 were sent to Fox Sports Network's "First Team on Fox" for validation, during which they went 11-6-1 ATS (65%). Past results will not guarantee future performance.

Past results will not guarantee future performance.